SMARTHEART CABG EDU

General information

SMARTHEART CABG EDU

Authors:
Gabriele DI GIAMMARCO, Tania DI MASCIO, Michele DI MAURO, Antonietta TARQUINIO, Pierpaolo VITTORINI

DOI:
10.14201/ADCAIJ2015412233

Volume:
Regular Issue 4 (1), 2015

Keywords:

Pre-operative education; user experience; anxiety

The paper reports on the SmartHeart CABG Edu Android app. The app was conceived to be an innovative and up-to-date tool for patient education, the first of its kind in the Italian context. In particular, the app was developed to provide educational material for patients about to undergo Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) surgery, a set of self-assessment tools concerning health status (i.e., BMI calculator, LDL cholesterol calculator and anxiety assessment tool) and usability questionnaires (i.e., SEQ and SUS). The paper initially describes the app, then reports on its evaluation, concerning both the app usability and the pre-operative anxiety, and ends by showing the improvements -- derived from the usability evaluation -- put into practice.

References

Bangor, A., Kortum, P., and Miller, J., 2009. Determining What Individual SUS Scores Mean: Adding an Adjective Rating Scale. JUS - The Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3):114–123.

Black, J. M. and Hawks, J. H., 2009. Medical-Surgical Nursing: Clinical Management for Positive Outcomes. ISBN 978-1-4160-4687-5.

Brooke, J., 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, 189:194.

Cohen, J., 1968. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70(4):213–220. ISSN 1939-1455(Electronic);0033-2909(Print). doi: 10.1037/h0026256.

Di Giammarco, G., Di Mascio, T., Di Mauro, M., Tarquinio, A., and Vittorini, P., 2015. SmartHeart CABG Edu: First Prototype and Preliminary Evaluation. In Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, number 374 in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pages 57–66. Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-319-19631-2, 978-3-319-19632-9.

Friedewald, W. T., Levy, R. I., and Fredrickson, D. S., 1972. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clinical chemistry, 18(6):499–502.

Gallagher, R. and McKinley, S., 2007. Stressors and anxiety in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. American Journal of Critical Care, 16(3):248–257.

Garrow, J. S. and Webster, J., 1984. Quetelet’s index (W/H2) as a measure of fatness. International journal of obesity, 9(2):147–153.

Gómez, R. Y., Cascado Caballero, D., and Sevillano, J.-L., 2014. Heuristic Evaluation on Mobile Interfaces: A New Checklist. The Scientific World Journal, 2014:e434326. ISSN 2356-6140. doi:10.1155/2014/434326.

Nielsen, J. and Mack, R. L., 1994. Usability Inspection Methods. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York. ISBN 9780471018773.

Rahimianfar, A. A., Javadi, S. S., Dehghani, H., Sareban, M. T., Akbarzade, T., Eslami, A., Rahimianfar, F., and Khosravi, A., 2013. The effect of Training Booklet on anxiety level of the patients candidate for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Journal of Biology and today’s world, 2(10).

Sauro, J. and Dumas, J. S., 2009. Comparison of three one-question, post-task usability questionnaires. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1599–1608. ACM.

Seffah, A., Donyaee, M., Kline, R. B., and Padda, H. K., 2006. Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model. Software Quality Journal, 14(2):159–178. 11

Shuldham, C. M., Fleming, S., and Goodman, H., 2002. The impact of pre-operative education on recovery following coronary artery bypass surgery. A randomized controlled clinical trial. European heart journal, 23(8):666–674.

Young, A., Geyer, N., and Young, A., 2009. Juta’s manual of nursing. v. 1. Juta, Limited. ISBN 9780702180323.

Zigmond, A. S. and Snaith, R. P., 1983. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta psychiatrica scandinavica, 67(6):361–370.

How to cite item?